Qualitative Sentiment Analysis

Purpose

We talked with American voters and non-voters to understand the larger themes around voting sentiments in 2020.

  • Problem to solve: Identifying the knowledge gaps in understanding voting sentiments in the United States from multiple perspectives (voters/non-voters, multiple generational groups, federal, state, local levels).

    Hypotheses: There is more nuance in voting decisions than apathy and vote campaigns don’t address these friction points.

  • We conducted 38 remote, unmoderated sessions spanning a variety of audiences and topics:

    ➡ Audience: Voters and non-voters across four identified generational groups—Baby Boomers (Ages 56-74), Generation Xers (Ages 40-55), Millennials (Ages 24-39), and Generation Zers (Ages 18-23).

    ➡ Topics: Previous presidential election voting experience (if any), 2020 presidential election, local elections, state elections, information-gathering during elections.

  • An article shared the following key findings:

    ➡ Most voters and non-voters care about the country and feel that elections are important.

    ➡ A lack of objective information on issues and candidates is one of the most important reasons why people don’t vote.

    ➡ Many people say local issues are important to them, but it’s hard to get trusted information to help them decide those votes.

    ➡ There’s strong interest in online voting because it would be convenient. But some people, especially older ones, are nervous that it could be hacked.

  • ➡ It sparked conversations about voting in a larger forum (LinkedIn).

    ➡ It showed the value of using research to uncover behavioral insights beyond product or digital experiences.

Deliverables

Insights were developed into an article supporting human empathy.

Feedback reels were compiled to present non-voter and voter perspectives alongside one another.

Header image by phil scroggs

Previous
Previous

Mixed Method Benchmark

Next
Next

Ongoing Relationships